Why We Exist

The one rule

This is not pro-one-side or pro-the-other. This is pro-child. Period.

Every serious conflict comes with a full library of history, grievance, law and counter-argument. People spend careers on it. We are not going to settle any of that here, and we are not going to pretend we can.

What we will not do is treat the killing of children as a debating position. A dead child is not a talking point to be balanced against another talking point. There is no ledger in which one side’s dead children cancel out the other’s. If your first reaction to a dead child is to name the child’s nationality, something has gone wrong — not with the argument, with you. It has gone wrong with all of us, which is exactly why this project exists.

So the rule is simple, and it applies in every direction, without exception: children are not acceptable losses. Not ours, not theirs, not anyone’s.

The philosophy

What we mean by “the line”.

A red line is supposed to be the thing you do not cross regardless of the provocation. Not a preference. Not a policy that flexes with circumstances. The floor.

For most of the last century, humanity said out loud — in treaties it wrote, signed and taught to its own soldiers — that children in war sit below that floor. Not to be targeted. Not to be counted as an acceptable cost. Not to be argued about.

What changed is not the treaties. What changed is us. We learned the vocabulary that makes a dead child survivable to think about: collateral, complex, proportionate, tragic but. Every one of those words is a small door out of the room. Enough of them and you can walk past anything.

Drawing the line back is not a military demand or a political programme. It is a refusal to keep using the vocabulary. It starts with individual people saying the plain sentence, in public, with their names on it — which is the entire mechanism of this campaign, and the reason it can work without permission from anyone.

We are not politicians. We are not soldiers. We are humans who remember: there is a line, and we are drawing it back.

The story of the song

How “The Line” came to exist.

This section is the artist’s to write. It is deliberately left blank rather than filled with invented biography — a personal story is the one thing on this site that cannot be written by anyone but the person it happened to, and readers can always tell.

Three or four short paragraphs is enough. What was on the screen the night it started. What made writing it feel necessary and also presumptuous. Why a song rather than a donation. What the first listener said. Keep it small and specific — the smaller and more specific it is, the larger it reads.

Who is behind this

One person, and everyone who joins.

[ Artist name ]

Writer, producer, and the person who pays the hosting bill

Replace with a short bio — two or three sentences, first person, no press-release voice. Include: what you do, why you are qualified to have started this (which may be “I am not, I just couldn’t not”), and what you are asking people for.

Photo: 800×800, JPG or WebP, at /assets/images/founder.jpg. A real photograph, looking at the camera. This project asks people to attach their names to something — it has to go first.

No organization

There is no board, no office, no staff. Two static websites, a song, and whoever decides to stand next to it.

No funding

Nobody is paying for this campaign, and nobody is being paid by it. That is checkable on the transparency page.

No affiliation

No party, no government, no armed group, no NGO. If any of that ever changes, it gets announced here before anywhere else.

Contact

Say something.

Press, radio, venues, translators, teachers, sceptics and people who think this whole thing is naive — all welcome. Disagreement gets a reply too, as long as it is about the argument.

Prefer plain email? hello@children-of-gaza.org · Corrections: corrections@children-of-gaza.org · Money: transparency@children-of-gaza.org